Landscape Structure and Wildlife Patterns Essay

Landscape Structure and Wild life sentence Patterns - Essay ExampleStrathearn, Perthshire is a broad river rising tide plain under mixed agricultural land use where substantial entropy were collected in 1998-2000 during a biodiversity study funded by the Scottish executive. Surveys of plants and animals were carried out within fields or unenclosed semi-natural habitats crossways the site. Various land cover data were collected within 1km diameter circles around the sample status so that relationships betwixt landscape and species diversity could be investigated. On the second map you will throw my 1km circle situated near the river.We where provided with information on the land covers in 1km diameter circles around sites where wildlife were surveys during 1999. I used a geographical recordic information system (GIS) to derive measures of landscapes structure that can be compared with selected wildlife data from field survey.The graph present the comparison between scope woodl and and the count of wild life shows significant variation in the presence of same species in the wood land of same study at different locations. The dumbness of these species shows analogous crooks to a greater extend. In an area below 60000, the accessibility of plant spp. ranges between 0 and 5 in some woodland while in others it ranges between 5 and 15. The trend is similar at a higher woodland area ranging between 105000 and 130000. in that respect is an absence of woodland area ranging between 53000 and 105000 in the catchment area.The graph... -0.018597634spring oil seed rape-0.13902295 chaff-1.167727571d. wildlife land cover graphs from the grouped data for the river catchment, i have choose to 3 they are attached, contain a brief paragraph on each. Figure 3. Landscape structure and wildlife patternThe graph showing the comparison between area woodland and the count of wild life shows significant variation in the presence of same species in the wood land of same area at different locations. The density of these species shows similar trends to a greater extend. In an area below 60000, the availableness of plant spp. ranges between 0 and 5 in some woodland while in others it ranges between 5 and 15. The trend is similar at a higher woodland area ranging between 105000 and 130000. There is an absence of woodland area ranging between 53000 and 105000 in the catchment area. Figure 4. Landscape structure and wildlifeThe graph shows similar pattern between the availability of damns and plant spp. in an area with diversity in landscape structure. The availability of number of individual is equal with the diversity.Figure 5. Crop diversity compared to chick speciesThe comparison between crop/pasture diversity and bird species shows that the number of bird species increases with increase in crop/pasture diversity. The graph shows a linear trend between the diversity in crop/pasture and the presence of bird species in the area. The availability of bird species highly varies within similar diverse crop/pasture areas. This could be assumed due to variation in type of cop/pasture available in the area. Figure 6. Diversity crops/pastures compared to plant speciesThe graph showing the tend between crop/pasture diversity and availability of plant species shows that there is no